Friday, August 20, 2004

The Whole Story

The most comprehensive article yet written about the formation of the “Swift Boat Vets for Hogwash” and their subsequent smear campaign appears today in the NY Times. The article addresses each of the group's specific claims, and cites previous quotes from these men that praise John Kerry. It also details the groups close ties to the Texas Republican establishment. In short it show's these men for the charlatans they truly are...

"A series of interviews and a review of documents show a web of connections to the Bush family, high-profile Texas political figures and President Bush's chief political aide, Karl Rove.

Records show that the group received the bulk of its initial financing from two men with ties to the president and his family - one a longtime political associate of Mr. Rove's, the other a trustee of the foundation for Mr. Bush's father's presidential library. A Texas publicist who once helped prepare Mr. Bush's father for his debate when he was running for vice president provided them with strategic advice. And the group's television commercial was produced by the same team that made the devastating ad mocking Michael S. Dukakis in an oversized tank helmet when he and Mr. Bush's father faced off in the 1988 presidential election...

The strategy the veterans devised would ultimately paint John Kerry the war hero as John Kerry the "baby killer" and the fabricator of the events that resulted in his war medals. But on close examination, the accounts of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth' prove to be riddled with inconsistencies. In many cases, material offered as proof by these veterans is undercut by official Navy records and the men's own statements.

Several of those now declaring Mr. Kerry "unfit" had lavished praise on him, some as recently as last year.

In an unpublished interview in March 2003 with Mr. Kerry's authorized biographer, Douglas Brinkley, provided by Mr. Brinkley to The New York Times, Roy F. Hoffmann, a retired rear admiral and a leader of the group, allowed that he had disagreed with Mr. Kerry's antiwar positions but said, "I am not going to say anything negative about him." He added, "He's a good man."

In a profile of the candidate that ran in The Boston Globe in June 2003, Mr. Hoffmann approvingly recalled the actions that led to Mr. Kerry's Silver Star: "It took guts, and I admire that."

George Elliott, one of the Vietnam veterans in the group, flew from his home in Delaware to Boston in 1996 to stand up for Mr. Kerry during a tough re-election fight, declaring at a news conference that the action that won Mr. Kerry a Silver Star was "an act of courage." At that same event, Adrian L. Lonsdale, another Vietnam veteran now speaking out against Mr. Kerry, supported him with a statement about the "bravado and courage of the young officers that ran the Swift boats."

"Senator Kerry was no exception," Mr. Lonsdale told the reporters and cameras assembled at the Charlestown Navy Yard. "He was among the finest of those Swift boat drivers."Those comments echoed the official record. In an evaluation of Mr. Kerry in 1969, Mr. Elliott, who was one of his commanders, ranked him as "not exceeded" in 11 categories, including moral courage, judgment and decisiveness, and "one of the top few" - the second-highest distinction - in the remaining five. In written comments, he called Mr. Kerry "unsurpassed," "beyond reproach" and "the acknowledged leader in his peer group."

...Mr. Perry, who has given $200,000 to the group, is the top donor to Republicans in the state, according to Texans for Public Justice, a nonpartisan group that tracks political donations. He donated $46,000 to President Bush's campaigns for governor in 1994 and 1998. In the 2002 election, the group said, he donated nearly $4 million to Texas candidates and political committees.

Mr. Rove, Mr. Bush's top political aide, recently said through a spokeswoman that he and Mr. Perry were longtime friends...

The group decided to hire a private investigator to investigate Mr. Brinkley's(Kerry's Biographer) account of the war - to find "some neutral way of actually questioning peopleinvolved in these incidents,'' Mr. O'Neill said.

But the investigator's questions did not seem neutral to some.

Patrick Runyon, who served on a mission with Mr. Kerry, said he initially thought the caller was from a pro-Kerry group, and happily gave a statement about the night Mr. Kerry won his first Purple Heart. The investigator said he would send it to him by e-mail for his signature. Mr. Runyon said the edited version was stripped of all references to enemy combat, making it look like just another night in the Mekong Delta.

"It made it sound like I didn't believe we got any returned fire," he said. "He made it sound like it was a normal operation. It was the scariest night of my life."

The group's arguments have foundered on other contradictions. In the television commercial, Dr. Louis Letson looks into the camera and declares, "I know John Kerry is lying about his first Purple Heart because I treated him for that injury." Dr. Letson does not dispute the wound - a piece of shrapnel above Mr. Kerry's left elbow - but he and others in the group argue that it was minor and self-inflicted.

Yet Dr. Letson's name does not appear on any of the medical records for Mr. Kerry.

...The group also offers the account of William L. Schachte Jr., a retired rear admiral who says in the book that he had been on the small skimmer on which Mr. Kerry was injured that night in December 1968. He contends that Mr. Kerry wounded himself while firing a grenade. But the two other men who acknowledged that they had been with Mr. Kerry, Bill Zaladonis and Mr. Runyon, say they cannot recall a third crew member. "Me and Bill aren't the smartest,
but we can count to three," Mr. Runyon said in an interview."


Unfortunately, this whole fiasco has tarnished the war record of a genuine American war hero. In today's sound byte culture, lies that are repeated enough times in the news and on the radio inevitably become the truth. Numerous conservative columnists latched on to these fabrications and pedaled them as fact. They owe John Kerry an apology. I won’t hold my breath. It's sad that a group of lying disgruntled old men with a political axe to grind can dishonor the courageous service a man gave to his country. If I were a Republican I would feel pretty damn ashamed.




3 Comments:

At August 20, 2004 at 9:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

If the November election is a referendum on who better and more courageously served their country in a time of war, Kerry would win in a landslide as he was there and Bush wasn’t. In fact, we don't even know if Bush was here.

--Nutz

 
At August 24, 2004 at 4:36 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

Interesting. So you believe military records when they're about Kerry (his awards citations), but not when they're about Bush (his honorable discharge). Hypocrisy abounds.

Oh, and I note even the NYT can't come up with a way to refute all the eyewitnesses to Kerry's "heroism" but instead have to whine about who is friends with whom. But that doesn't matter once you've drunk the Kerry Kool-Aide.

Looks like Lurch made a political mistake in putting his Vietnam service front and center.

 
At August 24, 2004 at 5:14 PM, Blogger ian said...

GE,

I have never said I didn't beleive the records that have only recently come to light, regarding Bush's national guard service. Get your facts straight! Secondly, you clearly have no idea what your talking about when it comes to John Kerry's service, because those same men that are now denouncing his actions, praised him as recently as five years ago. Furthermore, the vast majority of this group are NOT in fact eyewitnesses, if you want an eyewitness account go the Chicago Tribune, or to today's Wash Post, you might learn a thing or two, until then stop slandering an American who served his country honorably. And stop drinking that Swift Boat Kool Aid....i thought you were smarter then that.

Guess not.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home